Immigration
is the arrival of new individuals into a habitat or population. It is a biological concept and is important in population ecology, differentiated from emigration and migration.
|
IMMIGRANT TICKETS
|
As a political term
Immigration is a modern phenomenon. It owes its existence to the needs of an ever more intensely integrated global capitalist economy to have people move around for the purpose of work, for reproduction of labor power (studies, particularly higher and more specialized forms of knowledge) or political asylum across the borders of, some believe, an increasingly obsolete inter-state system. Immigrants are people who obtain legal status marked, at a minimum, by some form of residence permit that regulates the terms of their employment (see also
expatriates). Some, but by no means all, foreign workers and expatriates seek and reach
citizenship in the state where they work. Immigrants are different from the
undocumented labor force in that the latter does not have legal status in the country in which s/he works. (There can be a host of complex reasons for lack of legal status: lack of interest on part of the worker, the state's refusal to grant such permits to categories of foreign workers, institutional racism, etc.) Not all undocumented workers are, strictly speaking, illegal: Because of the complex history of global migrations, several powerful states, such as the United States, Canada, etc. have had legal systems in which work without explicit consent of the state has fallen through legal "cracks." Both immigrants and undocumented workers differ from
tourists as the later do not engage in income earning activities in the countries they visit, so their economic impact is restricted mainly to consumption and environmental consequences. Seasonal labor migration is often treated in the press and in political rhetoric as a form of immigration.
The modern concept of immigration is related to the development of
nation-states and
nationality law and/or
citizenship law.
Citizenship in a nation-state confers an inalienable right of residence in that state, but
residency of non-citizens is subject to conditions set by
immigration law. The emergence of modern nation-states made immigration a political issue: by imagining its populations, in violation of multi-ethnic, multi-'racial', multi-cultural realities 'on the ground', as homogenous blocks, constituting a
nation defined by shared, single ethnicity, 'race' and/or culture. Legal and political restrictions on the presence of foreigners is a highly controversial political theme because such restrictions are introduced and maintained by states whose citizens have had a major, sustained and deeply consequential presence in states other than their own (see:
colonialism).
The
International Organization for Migration said there are more than 200 million migrants around the world today.
Europe hosted the largest number of immigrants, with 70.6 million people in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available.
North America, with over 45.1 million immigrants, is second, followed by
Asia, which hosts nearly 25.3 million. Most of today's migrant workers come from Asia.
[1] The global volume of immigration has been strikingly low in relative terms. The International Integration and Refugee Association estimated a mere 175 million international migrants in 2005, under 3 percent of the
global population. Contrast that to the average rate of globalization (the proportion of cross-border trade in all trade), which exceeds 20 percent.
The Middle East, some parts of Europe, small areas of South East Asia, and a few spots in the West Indies have the highest percentages of immigrant population recorded by the UN Census 2005. The reliability of immigrant censuses is, however, lamentably low due to the concealed character of undocumented labor migration. The
International Organization for Migration has estimated the number of foreign migrants to be over 200 million worldwide today.
One theory of immigration distinguishes between
push factors and
pull factors.
[2] Push factors refer primarily to the motive for
emigration from the country of origin. In the case of economic migration (usually labour migration), differentials in
wage rates are prominent. If the value of wages in the new country surpasses the value of wages in one’s native country, he or she may choose to migrate as long as the travel costs are not too high. Particularly in the 19th century, economic expansion of the U.S. increased migrant flow, and in effect, nearly 20% of the population was foreign born versus today’s value of 10%, making up a significant amount of the labor force. Poor individuals from less developed countries
can
have far higher standards of living in developed countries than in their originating countries. The cost of emigration, which includes both the explicit costs, the ticket price, and the implicit cost, lost work time and loss of community ties, also play a major role in the pull of emigrants away from their native country. As transportation technology improved, travel time and costs decreased dramatically between the 18th and early 20th century. Travel across the Atlantic used to take up to 5 weeks in the 1700s, but around the time of the 1900s it took a mere 8 days.
[3] When the
opportunity cost is lower, the immigration rates tend to be higher.
Escape from
poverty (personal or for relatives staying behind) is a traditional push factor, the availability of
jobs is the related pull factor.
Natural disasters and can amplify poverty-driven migration flows. This kind of migration may be
illegal immigration in the destination country (emigration is also illegal in some countries, such as
North Korea,
Myanmar,
Zimbabwe, and
Somalia).
The main problem with push-and-pull theories is three-fold: first, they state the obvious (i.e., people from poorer places will seek to go to richer ones); second, they are unable to explain the emergence of migrant flows (if push and pull were the only things in existence, people from the poorest countries would migrate to the richest ones, when in reality such flows are well-nigh non-existent); third, they are unable to explain the stability of the emerging patterns of migration (i.e., once a flow from country A to country B is established, it will stay on for a relatively long time, even if the initial conditions that had given the push and pull to the migration are not there any more (as the case of the German case of the
Gastarbeiter, or
guest worker program shows.
Emigration and immigration are sometimes mandatory in a contract of employment: religious
missionaries, and employees of
transnational corporations, international
non-governmental organisations and the
diplomatic service expect, by definition, to work 'overseas'. They are often referred to as '
expatriates', and their conditions of employment are typically equal to or better than those applying in the host country (for similar work).
For some migrants,
education is the primary pull factor (although most
international students are not classified as immigrants).
Retirement migration from rich countries to lower-cost countries with better
climate, is a new type of international migration. Examples include immigration of retired
British citizens to
Spain or
Italy and of retired
Canadian citizens to the
U.S. (mainly to the U.S. states of
Florida and
Texas).
Non-economic push factors include
persecution (religious and otherwise), frequent
abuse,
bullying,
oppression,
ethnic cleansing and even
genocide, and risks to civilians during
war. Political motives traditionally motivate refugee flows—to escape
dictatorship for instance.
Some migration is for personal reasons, based on a
relationship (e.g. to be with family or a partner), such as in
family reunification or
transnational marriage. In a few cases, an individual may wish to emigrate to a new country in a form of transferred
patriotism. Evasion of
criminal justice (e.g. avoiding
arrest) is a personal motivation. This type of emigration and immigration is not normally legal, if a crime is internationally recognized, although criminals may disguise their identities or find other loopholes to evade detection. There have been cases, for example, of those who might be guilty of war crimes disguising themselves as victims of war or conflict and then pursuing asylum in a different country.
Barriers to immigration come not only in legal form; natural and social barriers to immigration can also be very powerful. Immigrants when leaving their country also leave everything familiar: their family, friends, support network, and culture. They also need to liquidate their assets often at a large loss, and incur the expense of moving. When they arrive in a new country this is often with many uncertainties including finding work, where to live, new laws, new cultural norms, language or accent issues, possible
racism and other exclusionary behaviour towards them and their family. These barriers act to limit international migration (scenarios where populations move
en masse
to other continents, creating huge population surges, and their associated strain on infrastructure and services, ignore these inherent limits on migration.)
Some states, such as
Japan, have opted for technological changes to increase profitability (for example, greater
automation), and designed immigration laws specifically to prevent immigrants from coming to, and remaining within, the country. However, globalization, as well as low birth rates and an aging work force, has forced even Japan to reconsider its immigration policy.
[4] Japan's colonial past has also created considerable pockets of non-Japanese in Japan. Most of these groups, e.g., Koreans, have faced extreme levels of discrimination in Japan.
[5]
As a principle, citizens of one member nation of the
European Union are allowed to work in other member nations with little to no restriction on movement.
[6] For non-EU-citizen permanent residents in the EU, movement between EU-member states is considerably more difficult. After new waves of accession to the European Union, earlier members have often introduced measures to restrict participation in "their" labour markets by citizens of the new EU-member states. For instance, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain each restricted their labour market for up to seven years both in the 2004 and 2007 round of accession.
[7]
Due to the European Union's—in principle—single internal labour market policy, societies that have seen relatively low levels of labour immigration until recently—which have sent a significant portion of their population overseas in the past—such as
Italy and the
Republic of Ireland are seeing an influx of immigrants from EU countries with lower per capita annual earning rates, triggering nationwide immigration debates.
[8] [9]
Spain, meanwhile, is seeing growing illegal immigration from
Africa. As Spain is the closest EU member nation to Africa—Spain even has two autonomous cities (
Ceuta and
Melilla) on the African continent, as well as an autonomous community (the
Canary Islands) west of North Africa, in the Atlantic—it is physically easiest for African emigrants to reach. This has led to debate both within Spain and between Spain and other EU members. Spain has asked for border control assistance from other EU states; the latter have responded that Spain has brought the wave of African illegals on itself by granting amnesty to hundreds of thousands of immigrants.
[10]
The
United Kingdom and
Germany have seen major immigration since the end of World War II and have been debating the issue for decades. Foreign workers were brought in to those countries to help rebuild after the war, and many stayed. Political debates about immigration typically focus on statistics, the immigration law and policy, and the implementation of existing restrictions.
[11] [12] In some European countries the debate in the 1990s was focused on asylum seekers, but restrictive policies within the European Union, as well as a reduction in armed conflict in Europe and neighboring regions, have sharply reduced asylum seekers.
[13]
In the United States political debate on immigration has flared repeatedly since the US became independent. Some on the far-left of the political spectrum attribute anti-immigration rhetoric to an all-"white", under-educated and parochial minority of the population, ill-educated about the relative advantages of immigration for the US economy and society.
[14] While this mentality shows an obvious bias, it is often hard for civil discussion to occur regarding immigration due to its highly emotional underpinnings.
Since September 11, 2001, the politics of immigration has become an extremely hot issue. It was a central topic of the 2008 election cycle.
[15] The Mayor of New York City,
Michael Bloomberg is noted
[16] for having a pro-immigration stand.
The politics of immigration have become increasingly associated with other issues, such as
national security,
terrorism, and in western Europe especially, with the presence of
Islam as a new major religion. Those with security concerns cite the
2005 civil unrest in France that point to the
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy as an example of the value conflicts arising from immigration of
Muslims in Western Europe while failing to recognize the fact that most participants of the 2005 civil unrest were citizens of France, not immigrants themselves, and the essence of their protest was denial of equal rights, and blatant racism, on the part of the state. Because of all these associations, immigration has become an emotional political issue in many European nations.
Economic Migrant
The term economic migrant refers to someone who has immigrated from one country to another country for the purposes of seeking employment or improved financial position. An economic migrant is distinct from someone who is a
refugee fleeing persecution. An economic migrant can be someone from the United States immigrating to the UK or visa a verca.
Many countries have immigration and visa restrictions that prohibit a person entering the country for the purposes of gaining work without a valid work visa. Persons who are declared an economic migrant can be refused entry into a country.
Ethics
Although
freedom of movement is often recognized as a
civil right, the freedom only applies to movement within national borders: it may be guaranteed by the
constitution or by human rights legislation. Additionally, this freedom is often limited to
citizens and excludes others. No
state currently allows full freedom of movement across its borders, and international
human rights treaties do not confer a general right to enter another state. According to Article 13 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, citizens may not be forbidden to leave their country. There is no similar provision regarding entry of non-citizens. Those who reject this distinction on ethical grounds, argue that the freedom of movement both within and between countries is a basic human right, and that the restrictive immigration policies, typical of nation-states, violate this human right of freedom of movement.
[17] Such arguments are common among anti-state ideologies like
anarchism and
libertarianism. As philosopher and "Open Borders" activist
Jacob Appel has written, "Treating human beings differently, simply because they were born on the opposite side of a national boundary, is hard to justify under any mainstream philosophical, religious or ethical theory."
[18]
Where immigration is permitted, it is typically selective. Ethnic selection, such as the
White Australia policy, has generally disappeared, but priority is usually given to the educated, skilled, and wealthy—which is in direct contradiction to the needs of the labour market (demanding un-skilled and poor people with low levels of education, willing to do jobs wealthier locals refuse to do). Less privileged individuals, including the mass of poor people in low-income countries, cannot avail of the legal and protected immigration opportunities offered by wealthy states. This inequality has also been criticised as conflicting with the principle of
equal opportunities, which apply (at least in theory) within democratic nation-states. The fact that the door is closed for the unskilled, while at the same time many developed countries have a huge demand for unskilled labour, is a major factor in
undocumented immigration. The contradictory nature of this policy—which specifically disadvantages the unskilled immigrants while exploiting their labour—has also been criticised on ethical grounds.
Immigration polices which selectively grant freedom of movement to targeted individuals are intended to produce a net economic gain for the host country. They can also mean net loss for a poor donor country through the loss of the educated minority—the
brain drain. This can exacerbate the
global inequality in
standards of living that provided the motivation for the individual to migrate in the first place. An example of the 'competition for skilled labour' is active recruitment of health workers by
First World countries, from the
Third World.
By country
Europe
According to
Eurostat,
[19] Some EU member states are currently receiving large-scale immigration: for instance
Spain, where the economy has created more than half of all the new jobs in the EU over the past five years.
[20] The EU, in 2005, had an overall net gain from international migration of +1.8 million people. This accounts for almost 85% of Europe's total population growth in 2005.
[21] In 2004, total 140,033 people immigrated to
France. Of them, 90,250 were from
Africa and 13,710 from
Europe.
[22] In 2005, immigration fell slightly to 135,890.
[23]
many problems can form, like in the book [The Shifting Heart] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shifting_Heart
British emigration towards
Southern Europe is of special relevance. Citizens from the European Union make up a growing proportion of immigrants in
Spain. They mainly come from countries like the UK and Germany, but the British case is of special interest due to its magnitude. The British authorities estimate that the British population in Spain at 700,000.
[24]
Norway
In recent years, immigration has accounted for more than half of
Norway's population growth. In 2006, Statistics Norway's (SSB) counted a record 45,800 immigrants arriving in Norway—30% higher than 2005.
[25] At the beginning of 2007, there were 415,300 persons in Norway with an immigrant background (i.e. immigrants, or born of immigrant parents), comprising 8.3 per cent of the total population.
[26]
United Kingdom
In 2007, net immigration to the UK was 237,000, a rise of 46,000 on 2006.
[27] In 2004 the number of people who became
British citizens rose to a record 140,795—a rise of 12% on the previous year. This number had risen dramatically since 2000. The overwhelming majority of new citizens come from
Asia (40%) and
Africa (32%), the largest three groups being people from
Pakistan,
India and
Somalia.
[28] In 2005, an estimated 565,000 migrants arrived to live in the UK for at least a year, most of the migrants were people from
Asia (particularly the
Indian subcontinent) and
Africa,
[29] while 380,000 people emigrated from the UK for a year or more, with
Australia,
Spain and
France most popular destinations.
[30] Following
Poland's entry into the EU in May 2004 it is estimated that by the start of 2007, 375,000 Poles have registered to work in the UK, although the total Polish population in the UK is believed to be 500,000. Many Poles work in seasonal occupations and a large number are likely to move back and forth including between Ireland and other EU Western nations.
[31] The current UK Immigration Minister is Phil Woolas.
[32]
Spain
Spain is the most favoured European destination for Britons leaving the UK.
[33]
Since 2000,
Spain has absorbed more than three million immigrants, growing its population by almost 10%. Immigrant population now tops over 4.5 million. According to residence permit data for 2005, about 500,000 were
Moroccan, another 500,000 were
Ecuadorian,
[34] more than 200,000 were
Romanian, and 260,000 were
Colombian.
[35] [36] In 2005 alone, a regularisation programme increased the legal immigrant population by 700,000 people.
[37]
Portugal
Portugal, long a country of emigration,
[38] has now become a country of net immigration, and not just from the former
colonies; by the end of 2003, legal refugees immigrants represented about 4% of the population, and the largest communities were from
Cape Verde,
Brazil,
Angola,
Guinea-Bissau,
UK,
Spain and
Ukraine.
[39]
Canada
Canada has the
highest per capita net immigration rate in the world,
[40] driven by
economic policy and
family reunification. In 2001, 250,640 people immigrated to Canada. Newcomers settle mostly in the major urban areas of
Toronto,
Vancouver and
Montreal. By the 1990s and 2000s, a majority of Canada's immigrants came from
Asia.
[41] Accusing a person of racism in Canada is usually considered a serious slur.
[42] All political parties are now cautious about criticising of the high level of immigration, because, as noted by the
Globe and Mail, "in the early 1990s, the old
Reform Party was branded 'racist' for suggesting that immigration levels be lowered from 250,000 to 150,000."
[43]
Israel/Palestine
Jewish immigration to
Palestine during the 19th century was promoted by the
Austro-Hungarian journalist
Theodor Herzl in the late 19th century following the publication of "
Der Judenstaat".
[44] His
Zionist movement sought to encourage
Jewish migration, or immigration, to
Palestine. Its proponents regard its aim as
self-determination for the Jewish people.
[45]
The percentage of world Jewry living in the former
Palestinian Mandate has steadily grown from 25,000 since the movement came into existence. Today about 40% of the world's Jews live in Israel, more than in any other country.
[46] The Israeli
Law of Return, passed in 1950, gives those born Jews (having a Jewish mother or grandmother), those with Jewish ancestry (having a Jewish father or grandfather) and converts to Judaism (Orthodox, Reform, or Conservative denominations—not secular—though Reform and Conservative conversions must take place outside the state, similar to civil marriages) the right to immigrate to Israel. A 1970 amendment, extended immigration rights to "a child and a grandchild of a Jew, the spouse of a Jew, the spouse of a child of a Jew and the spouse of a grandchild of a Jew".
Japan
According to Japanese immigration centre
[47], the number of foreign residents in Japan has been steadily increased, and the number of foreign residents (including permanent residents, but excluding illegal immigrants and short-term visitors such as tourists) were more than 2 million people in 2005.
[48] Also, according to
Japanese Association for Refugees
, (or
JAR
for short),
[49] the number of refugees who applied to live in Japan rapidly increased since 2006, and there were more than a thousand applications from all over the world, who seek refugee status to live in Japan in the year of 2008.
[50] However, the refugee policy of Japanese government has been criticized both domestically and internationally, because the number of refugees in Japan is still small compared to the countries like
Canada in North America or
France in Western Europe.
Australia
The overall level of immigration to
Australia has grown substantially during the last decade. Net overseas migration increased from 30,000 in 1993
[51] to 118,000 in 2003-04.
[52] The largest components of immigration are the skilled migration and family re-union programs. In recent years the
mandatory detention of
unauthorised arrivals
by boat has generated great levels of controversy. During the 2004-05, total 123,424 people immigrated to Australia. Of them, 17,736 were from
Africa, 54,804 from
Asia, 21,131 from
Oceania, 18,220 from
United Kingdom, 1,506 from
South America, and 2,369 from
Eastern Europe.
131,000 people migrated to Australia in 2005-06
[53] and migration target for 2006-07 was 144,000.
[54]
New Zealand
New Zealand has relatively open
immigration policies. 23% of the population was born overseas, mainly in
Asia,
Oceania, and
UK, one of the highest rates in the world. In 2004-2005, a target of 45,000 immigrants was set by the New Zealand immigration Service and represented 1.5% of the total population.
United States of America
From 1850 to 1930, the foreign born population of the United States increased from 2.2 million to 14.2 million. The highest percentage of foreign born people in the United States were found in this period, with the peak in 1890 at 14.7%. During this time, the lower costs of Atlantic Ocean travel in time and fare made it more advantageous for immigrants to move to the U.S. than in years prior. Following this time period immigration fell because in 1924 Congress implemented a quota system in which each country was only allowed to have 2% more immigrants per year based on their respective numbers in 1890. The
Immigration Act of 1924 favored immigrant source countries that already had many immigrants in the U.S. by 1890.
[55] Immigration continued to fall throughout the 1940s and 1950's, but it increased again afterwards. but was still low by historical standards.
[56]
After 2000,
immigration to the United States numbered approximately 1,000,000 per year. In 2006, 1.27 million immigrants were granted
legal residence.
Mexico has been the leading source of new U.S. residents for over two decades; and since 1998,
China,
India and the
Philippines have been in the top four sending countries every year.
[57] The U.S. has often been called the "melting pot"(derived from Carl N. Degler, a historian, author of Out of Our Past), a name derived from United States' rich tradition of immigrants coming to the US looking for something better and having their cultures melded and incorporated into the fabric of the country. Emma Lazarus, in a poem entitled "The New Colossus," which is inscribed on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty tells of the invitation extended to those wanting to make the US their home.
Since
World War II, more
refugees have found homes in the U.S. than any other nation and more than two million
refugees have arrived in the U.S. since 1980 (representing less than 1% of the entire United States population). Of the top ten countries accepting resettled refugees in 2006, the United States accepted more than twice as much as the next nine countries combined, although some smaller countries accept more refugees per capita.
See also
Notes
- Rich world needs more foreign workers: report, FOXNews.com, December 02, 2008
- See the NIDI/Eurostat '''push and pull study''' for details and examples: [1]
- Boustan, Leah. "Fertility and Immigration." UCLA. 15 Jan. 2009.
- Japanese Immigration Policy: Responding to Conflicting Pressures
- Koreans in Japan
- Eures - Free Movement
- See, e.g., EU Enlargement in 2007: No Warm Welcome for Labor Migrants, by Catherine Drew and Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah, Institute for Public Policy Research
- Independent: "Realism is not racism in the immigration debate"
- "Italy's Recent Change From An Emigration Country to An Immigration Country and Its Impact on Italy's Refugee and Migration Policy" by Andrea Bertozzi
- BBC: EU nations clash over immigration
- Deutsche Welle: Germans Consider U.S. Experience in Immigration Debate
- BBC: Short History of Immigration
- BBC: Analysis: Europe's asylum trends
- see, e.g., http://cmd.princeton.edu/papers/POM_0408.pdf or http://cmd.princeton.edu/files/POM_june2007.pdf
- BBC: Q&A: US immigration debate
- Mayor Bloomberg: Right on Neighborhoods, Right on Immigration
- Theresa Hayter, ''Open Borders: The Case Against Immigration Controls'', London: Pluto Press, 2000.
- The Ethical Case for an Open Immigration Policy
- Eurostat News Release on Immigration in EU
- Article on Spanish Immigration
- Europe: Population and Migration in 2005
- Inflow of third-country nationals by country of nationality
- Immigration and the 2007 French Presidential Elections
- British Immigrants Swamping Spanish Villages?
- Immigration to Norway increasing
- Immigrant population
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7737134.stm
- BBC Thousands in UK citizenship queue
- 1,500 immigrants arrive in Britain daily, report says{{Dead link|date=April 2009}}
- Indians largest group among new immigrants to UK{{Dead link|date=April 2009}}
- 750,000 and rising: how Polish workers have built a home in Britain.
- http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/organisation/ministers1/phil-woolas/
- BBC article: Btits Abroad Country by Country
- Immigration Shift: Many Latin Americans Choosing Spain Over U.S.
- Spain: Immigrants Welcome
- Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Avance del Padrón Municipal a 1 de enero de 2006. Datos provisionales
- Spain grants amnesty to 700,000 migrants
- Portugal - Emigration
- Charis Dunn-Chan ,Portugal sees integration progress, BBC
- Canada's Immigration Program
- Inflow of foreign-born population by country of birth, by year
- Modern Racism in Canada by Phil Fontaine
- Is the current model of immigration the best one for Canada?, Globe and Mail, 12 December 2005. Retrieved 16 August 2006.
- Walter Laqueur (2003) ''The History of Zionism'' Tauris Parke Paperbacks, ISBN 1860649327 p 40
- A national liberation movement: Rockaway, Robert. Zionism: The National Liberation Movement of The Jewish People, World Zionist Organization, January 21, 1975, accessed August 17, 2006). Shlomo Avineri:(Zionism as a Movement of National Liberation, Hagshama department of the World Zionist Organization, December 12, 2003, accessed August 17, 2006).
Neuberger, Binyamin. Zionism - an Introduction, Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, August 20, 2001, accessed August 17, 2006).
- http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/jewpop.html accessed Feb 2009
- ??17????????????????????(Number of Foreign residents in Japan)
- 2008?9?19?-????????? ??1000??????????? (People seeking refugee status to stay in Japan are more than 1000 this year (September 19, 2008 article)
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, International migration
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 3101.0 Australian Demographic Statistics
- Settler numbers on the rise{{Dead link|date=April 2009}}
- Australian Immigration Fact Sheet 20. Migration Program Planning Levels
- Immigration Act of 1924
- [1] Jenson, Campbell, and Emily Lennon. "Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign born population."
- United States: Top Ten Sending Countries, By Country of Birth, 1986 to 2006 (table available by menu selection)